Perpetual Volunteers: Teachers Should Not Be Expected To Work For Free

I saw a “job announcement” last week for someone to teach after-school classes. It touted the “opportunity” to plan lessons and run classes (and of course it would also include classroom management, material preparations, and parent relations). In all ways, it appeared to be a posting for a part-time teaching job. The kicker? The job was completely volunteer!
I’m all for volunteerism, but when the volunteer “opportunity” looks EXACTLY like a highly-skilled day job, it starts to cross into insulting territory. For what other profession is this acceptable? “Looking to give a surgeon the opportunity to perform brain surgery several hours per week on a volunteer basis.” “Looking to give a carpenter the opportunity to remodel kitchens several hours per week on a volunteer basis.” Watch other skilled workers line up to grovel for these “opportunities.” Many professionals and small businesses will do pro bono or discounted work, but it’s usually in line with their normal work schedule and not taken on as an entirely separate job.
A teacher’s skills are undervalued before they even begin their careers. There is a terrible institution called “student teaching.” It provides necessary on-the-job training, and is one of the painful rites of passage that unites teachers as a community, not unlike boot camp. Depending on the state, district, and university, student teaching can last one semester or a whole year, and the new teacher is responsible for all usual teacher duties while being supervised and critiqued for the duration. Not only is this labor unpaid, but student teachers are actually paying tuition for the privilege.
In most states, it is now the expectation that teachers hold a Master’s degree prior to being hired for an entry-level position, so many student teachers are paying graduate tuition in addition to providing skilled labor. It is near impossible to hold other jobs during student teaching, so most student teachers have to take out additional student loans to cover living expenses.
This sets the stage for people to view any work that teachers aren’t literally paying to do as an improvement. There are other professions whose required internships are paid, but they tend to lead to careers that pay better than teaching anyway. There is a huge disconnect between the assumption that teachers are no more than part-time babysitters and the reality that young, entry-level teachers begin their careers at poverty-level wages and with a Master’s degree worth of student loan debt.
Teachers and the people who love them talk a LOT about how underpaid they are, but also how their compensation is immaterial because the profession is supposed to be so darn rewarding. While this is a lovely way to build solidarity with your colleagues and comfort yourself as you apply for reduced-price school lunches for your children, it in a way excuses the undervaluing of the profession. Teachers are expected to be saints, above the petty human desires for a living wage and health insurance, and it’s like tearing up your Good Teacher Card if you complain about it.
We’ve all seen things like “What Teachers Make,” emphasizing the non-monetary benefits of being a teacher – which I refer to as the “Warm Fuzzies” – that sets up both teachers and their adversaries to count this as a form of compensation. The ugly truth: absolutely every job has some kind of non-monetary benefit, or else people wouldn’t do them. A pediatrician might enjoy working with kids and making them feel better. A graphic designer might enjoy the creativity and problem solving of producing quality work. A retail clerk might enjoy the personal connection with coworkers. But these benefits are never discussed as though they were a consolation prize or an excuse for being paid poverty wages, or being unpaid at all.
We need to stop expecting teachers to work for free. It drives down the perceived value of their highly skilled, expensively-acquired, trained labor to ZERO.
I’ve played this for my students for the past 8 years.
Awesome.
The ugly truth that seems to be totally missed by this writer seems to be the difference in kind between jobs like pediatrician, graphic designer and retail clerk and being a teacher. These other jobs listed have wages determined by market forces with relatively less state interference in the provision of these services. The state intervention that results in offering the product/service of teaching children for “free” to consumers (even making attendance mandatory by force of law) while obtaining operating costs by force (taxes). Therefore, there is no supply/demand price mechanism with which to determine the appropriate number of teachers and an economically feasible wage for the labor component. This is why socialism doesn’t work and will never work. Only voluntary markets can provide sustainable entities that provide a better service for a better price. Socialist systems are controlled by politics (guns) and clueless technocrats. Of course, with the government taking over health care pediatricians of the future will also become state workers and be in the same boat in 10 to 20 years.
Teaching used to be a profession where good teachers made good money because they offered there services on the open market. Now teachers are just government workers. If you want to help teachers, eliminate the virtual state monopoly on schooling.
Teachers have never offered their services on the open market; that is a new thought in line with the privatization of schools. Until the 1900s when the idea of public education came into view, schools were for the elite and privileged who could afford private or religious schools. Unfortunately, rather than adopt Dewey’s view it became a ‘factory’ model. Students were put in rows with the authority figure (teacher) running the show. Teachers should be a part of a system that values their expertise in educating ALL children. If left to market forces, only the rich will be able to pay for their services. Because we view teaching children as historically the province of women (historically a better work option for the educated woman than textile work, etc.) as a service provided by the government as an act of community, wages are historically low even as requirements and education standards for teachers are increased. Making it a market environment and treating students as widgets goes against all researched foundations of child development and sound pedagogy that best serves a diverse population ( preschool access, home enrichment, access to books, decent nutrition, stable home environment, etc) in delivery, accommodation and modification. Until we recognize the value to society of an equitable education system, accessible to all, and recognize teachers with the highest standards of peer reviewed performance and education teachers will not be paid a salary commensurate with their work.
Bingo! There are many countries in the world where schools are part of the free-market system, and they become a privilege of the wealthy minority.
socialism doesn’t work? Oh yea, I forgot that massive failure known as social security. and medicare. and I forgot about those failed nations of Sweden, Norway, Canada, Australia, and Germany.
teachers used to make peanuts. then they got unions, and they got paid and got benefits for the first time. then the republican war on workers took hold.
I still can’t figure out why, if free markets are so desirable, most major corporations do everything they can to “fix” markets in their favor, and minimize competition rather than enjoy the robust competition. Also, shouldn’t they be the first ones to give up government subsidies? Just saying. Philosophy should not be confused with reality.
http://t.co/DvwRRnqkbD http://t.co/ycM4LloiU9
Perpetual Volunteers: Teachers Should Not Be Expected To Work For Free http://t.co/1RGFZt7kEa
I met a former student of mine from my 1st year of teaching; he has graduated, and is working. He wants to go into the Marine Corps. He was one of my less than cooperative students back then. He said he realizes that I was on their side. They know that I want to help them unlock themselves to find unique thing about them that will amaze the world. If our children can see these truths about teachers, why can’t the rest of the country? It takes a village to raise children, and we are our brothers (and sisters) keepers….
Someone brought up how I felt about drug testing for welfare (Bristol). I am FOR it. I am also for welfare ONLY being available for 3-6 months every 5 years. Its to b get on your feet….not a way of life